Questions And Hypotheses

Audio

Q: Is the current physical failure mostly SNR, frequency response, or timing ambiguity?

Hypothesis:

  • It is primarily response/confusion plus weak direct-path SNR, not a fundamental codebook failure.

Test:

  • Compare calibration-weighted likelihood on stored hot mic captures.

Q: Is 192 kHz worth keeping for active sync?

Hypothesis:

  • Yes for fractional timing, loopback, and high-frequency option space; no as a magic acoustic fix when speakers/mics do not preserve ultrasonic energy.

Test:

  • Run same reliable-bin codebook at 48/96/192 kHz through physical path and compare anchor residuals, not just sample granularity.

Q: Should chirp-only and hybrid share one decoder?

Hypothesis:

  • Yes. Mode changes emission policy and confidence gating, not decode semantics.

Q: Can any three chirps always locate timeline position?

Hypothesis:

  • Only if they are correctly classified inside the active codebook and the receiver keeps enough timing/frequency spacing evidence. In meatspace, “any three heard chirps” means “any three reliable decoded symbols after path calibration,” not raw peaks.

Visual

Q: Should Leap or PS3 Eye be first direct runtime driver?

Hypothesis:

  • Leap is semantically highest value as timing/depth/near-field witness; PS3 Eye may be lower-risk for proving direct high-rate runtime plumbing.

Test:

  • Build the smaller driver first if it proves the seam faster, but do not lose the Leap timing-camera goal.

Q: Is realtime Gaussian splatting the first visual fusion target?

Hypothesis:

  • No. The first target is GPU feature/claim publication from synchronized frames. Splatting is the render/update representation after that.

Distributed

Q: Should Raven send raw audio/video or decoded observations?

Hypothesis:

  • Both may be needed, but timing authority should come from locally decoded codebook/schedule observations where possible. Raw streams are evidence; local decoded anchors are stronger over variable network latency.

Q: Can a phone know canonical time from codebook alone?

Hypothesis:

  • Yes if it has schedule epoch, symbol plan, sample-rate estimate, and enough reliable decoded anchors. It should report confidence and path model, not just “time.”

Implementation

Q: Is the native reservoir ready to replace C# buffers?

Hypothesis:

  • Conceptually yes, operationally not yet. First mirror C# buffer proof through reservoir status/views before making it the only path.

Q: Where does micro-optimization start?

Hypothesis:

  • Not with HLSL. First benchmark current active decode; if scalar bin scoring dominates, AVX2/FMA scorer is likely the best first optimization. GPU wins only when batches are large.